Who is nasa administrator

Low Dr. George M. Low acting. Fletcher Dr. James C. Lovelace Dr. Alan M. Lovelace acting. Frosch Dr. Robert A. Beggs James M. Graham Dr. William R. Graham acting. Myers Dale D. Myers acting. Truly VAdm Ret. Richard H. Truly acting. Goldin Daniel S. Mulville Dr. Daniel R. Mulville acting. O'Keefe Sean O'Keefe.

Gregory Col Ret. Frederick D. Gregory acting. Griffin Dr. Michael D. Scolese Christopher Scolese acting. Bolden Maj. Charles F. Template:Hs Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[". Seamans Dr. Robert C. Seamans, Jr. Mark Dr. Hans Mark. Thompson James R. Cohen Aaron Cohen acting.

Dailey John R. Hugh L. Webb , February 14, October 7, Dr. Thomas O. Paine , October 8, March 21, Acting Dr. Paine , March 21, September 15, Dr. George M. Low , September 16, April 26, Acting Dr. James C. Fletcher , April 27, May 1, Dr. Alan M. Lovelace , May 2, June 20, Acting Dr.

Robert A. Frosch , June 21, January 20, Dr. Beggs , July 10, December 4, Dr. William R. When President Obama took office in , the shuttle replacement program, known as Constellation, was experiencing significant technical problems; its initial cost estimates had tripled; and its schedule had slipped five years in its first four years of development.

President Obama proposed a program based on these recommendations, which would enable the agency to focus on innovative, sustainable missions that could expand our knowledge of our planet and our place in the universe.

He and his colleagues on both sides of the aisle passed legislation that would preserve existing, lucrative contracts, perpetuating expensive programs based on decades-old technology, which has kept more valuable missions grounded. As a result of these constraints, the SLS has cost U. Even with Uncle Sam as a competitor, SpaceX has built its own heavy lift rocket—the Falcon Heavy—nearly as capable, with new, reusable technologies, at no cost to the taxpayer.

The Falcon Heavy has already flown successfully several times. This has predictably led to grand pronouncements based on unrealistic industry estimates, multibillion-dollar cost overruns, years of schedule delays and unmet expectations—the real reason new administrations have canceled human spaceflight programs.

NASA is a national asset that, if given the right incentives, can make meaningful contributions to sustaining humanity on the Earth and eventually beyond. First among them is the expansion of human knowledge of the Earth and phenomena in the atmosphere and space. Poor and disadvantaged people are the most harmed by these changes, but all of life as we know it is under stress. Data show that over the next few decades, the damage we have caused will accelerate uncontrollably, making it even more difficult, if not impossible, to reverse.

We are facing the tipping point for human life on our home planet. Armed with the knowledge of what is happening and why, our view of Earth from space can offer solutions.

Global, high-fidelity, verifiable satellite data can help fuel innovative technologies that will move us away from fossil fuels, and perhaps even let us pull planet-warming gases out of the atmosphere. They can also strengthen policies and treaties that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the first place.

NASA investment in improved sensor technologies, data accessibility and distribution can provide critical, timely information to more precisely measure, model, predict and adapt to the climate crisis—limiting human suffering. NASA could also move beyond measurement and into action by focusing on solutions for communities at the front lines of drought, flooding and heat extremes. NASA could participate in the Civilian Climate Corps in partnership with the Department of Interior and Department of Agriculture, engaging earth and data scientists to train members of the corps to use satellite data to inform communities about the unique challenges they face to support smart, local decision-making.

Collaborating with the U.